@padzank Yeah had wished for the same. If only for the idea that it can improved our relationship with Binance and their community by promoting this trough social media. Was hoping to attract more BNB investors to our DEX with just one BNB pair.

https://swth.info/airdrop-log - here is the log with statuses and info, we can even see number of TradeHub wallets with ETH wallets activated now.

Volume since the proposal passed. I've added the relative triangular share (relative to total share). I execluded future markets, due to that the sum of total share is not 100%.

# Market Volume Total Share Rel. Tri. Share Liquidity Cur. Boost 1 eth1_usdc1 $5,797,117.93 16.6729% 28.4846% $251,068 8 2 swth_usdc1 $5,602,152.92 16.1121% 16.7492% $1.21m 18 3 swth_busd1 $3,241,817.65 9.3237% 18.0958% $213,667 8 4 swth_eth1 $2,371,613.74 6.8209% 38.8751% $393,117 18 5 busd1_usdc1 $2,300,426.18 6.6162% 44.1460% $519,272 3 6 bnb1_busd1 $2,017,762.76 5.8032% 15.8395% $118,670 6 7 nneo2_busd1 $1,974,220.26 5.6780% 16.9223% $130,405 4 8 wbtc1_usdc1 $1,355,299.41 3.8979% 47.8987% $249,731 7 9 nneo2_eth1 $1,205,559.14 3.4673% 31.7546% $122,388 4 10 eth1_wbtc1 $834,110.82 2.3990% 67.7240% $377,011 4 11 bnb1_eth1 $787,506.97 2.2649% 40.6574% $87,114 6 12 nneo2_usdc1 $766,435.07 2.2043% 33.9907% $52,784 2 13 cel1_busd1 $704,025.30 2.0248% 38.7616% $138,568 3 14 btcb1_busd1 $580,330.33 1.6691% 16.3458% $65,244 4 15 cel_eth $453,276.16 1.3037% 60.2875% $46,259 2 16 cel1_usdc1 $452,672.93 1.3019% 35.1293% $63,449 2 17 wbtc1_btcb1 $220,467.96 0.6341% 42.9432% $159,721 1 18 nex1_usdc1 $21,624.64 0.0622% 0.0000% $2,895.54 0

Edit: Added Liquidity and current pool weights

Since now SWTH/USDC is 50-50 same as SWTH/BUSD 50-50:

Should remove rewards from SWTH/BUSD and add that to SWTH/USDC - Total 24 Boost (Those coming from BUSD to buy SWTH have the USDC/BUSD pair).

OR

Make SWTH/USDC and SWTH/BUSD equal boost of 12 each.

Having different weight for 50 SWTH - USDC 50 and 50 SWTH - BUSDC 50 makes no sense since both are 50-50 and essentially stable coin.

@Juanito - Hi, Unfortunately, the proposal claimed from the SDF the exact number of tokens required to fulfil the unswapped users claims, so there are no additional tokens to distribute. As we have told others, if you can rally others who haven't claimed the procedure can be repeated, so long as somebody is prepared to do the legwork to make it happen via a proposal etc.

SDF should stay available for development purposes. Consider a proposal to divert a portion of the 10% tax to go to a new fund for initiatives such as this.

I like the idea in its essence. Some open questions:

How does it scale to > 23 validators? (e.g. How does this look like with 100 validators?) Ideally it should work nicely even if max validator num is voted to be larger or smaller by using scaled values, rather than using hard-coded numbers. In terms of implementation - what is needed? Has the cosmos-sdk codebase that is relevant to this (see x/distribution module) been looked at? Core devs only has time to do so after Stargate. If we have consensus on the idea, ideally the patch can be funded by SDF too.

@ravenxce said in [CIP-4] Extension of LP rewards and reallocation of pool weights:

@menghow Devs are setting this today.

great, thank you so much 🙂

Thank you. I will let the developers know

@acidbird I see - thanks!

Hello everyone 👋,

As planned, we provide the community with various tools in order to track and actively participate in the development of the application:

✍ Feedback platform: https://seraph-staking.hellonext.co/b/feedback
👀 Tracking platform: https://trello.com/b/VNpTQ5i3

This proposal being focused on the rewrite of the application in React Native, this is what we are currently working on but nothing prevents you from starting to propose new features or improvements.

On this occasion, I will be voting yes to this proposal on behalf of "intsol community staking" stakers, but am also persuaded by posts above of the need to open-source and not create open-ended costs for the SDF.
I request the swth.info developers to reconsider their stance on open-sourcing the swth.info site and for other community developers (myself included) to provide alternative information sources for the community.

@kang - All good points, we will need to put our money where our mouths are and seed liquidity, as you say, the raw maker fee rebate will not be enough initially to be an attraction. All of these listing should aim to build a habit in a growing number of traders in new communities to do it on TradeHub exchanges.

Thanks for the initiative.

,,This proposal will first be put up as a forum post to invite open discussion with the community. If the majority of the community is agreeable, we will submit the Community Pool Spend proposal for voting on 23 Feb 2022.''

and what about this spend proposal? did we dismiss it? 2 days are now over

We are working on using the full liquidity of the LP in the next upgrade, right now only ~30 quotes are generated, which results in a thinner liquidity than expected due to the small tick sizes.

Hi All,
300k SWTH disbursement has been made from the Intsol Community Staking validator wallet escrow to the developers as requested.

Transfer Transactions:
https://switcheo.org/transaction/9A04F25B589C605AE93287A8FE507584D2A0D2CB4DEA7F2CDA7F1765D19C3461?net=main
https://switcheo.org/transaction/4B17970A62B64CCB924061A9D2367084B2719D7726FAF32FEEEE9F0FC4291732?net=main

Code, documentation and test coverage are of a high standard.

Thanks to Switcheolytics and Devel484 for this collaboration and contribution to the community toolbox.

Here's looking forward to seeing what can be built using it 🙂

@Devel484 I supported the proposal to create a token just so that if we need it in the future, it's already accessible. It's not a bad idea to create the token first.

It might be good to have USDT/USDC pair tho

@redsparrow As DAOs are still at an early stage, I foresee a lot of trial and error as this space matures. Plutocracy is a recurring issue in voting though I think a well thought out reputation-based model with mechanisms that deter whales from colluding the system would be effective. For example, a mechanism to stop whales from swaying the vote at the last minute would be useful.
So, I suppose the voting structure from the get-go has to be well thought out based on the type of platform, product etc

Fantastic idea

@SannPaa
Yes if YouTube influencer not recommended, we can partner with crypto Twitter influencer (preferable Cosmos supporter)