Carbon Governance Forum
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Tags

    [TIP-10] Extension of LP Rewards & Updating of Pool Weights

    Proposals
    10
    20
    531
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      Deeppee last edited by

      n * 0 = 0 so boost coefficient can't be 0

      Also if SWTH-20-USDC-80 pair has an 80/20 ratio the same ratio should be on SWTH-50-BUSD-50

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • P
        pwankey @Devel484 last edited by

        @Devel484 said in [TIP-10] Extension of LP Rewards & Updating of Pool Weights:

        I like the idea of adding new markets, but we should stick to a few markets to get liquidity. The BNB markets could get us some traction.

        My personal opinion is to increase the rewards for LPs. We are in an early state where liquidity is very important. I am fine with 30% as we already had.

        I support we retain LPs rewards at 30%. In these days of high % LP rewards in the crypto space, our LPs should be competitive and attractive to attract Liquidity Providers. To bootstrap Demex, and list many pairs will really need enough liquidity. Bear in mind that if the new LPs are not well incentivized we run the risk of losing even the liquidity we currently have.

        I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • M
          Microtruffle @Deeppee last edited by Microtruffle

          @Deeppee Agree. I would also prefer a 80 BUSD / 20 SWTH pair like we have done with the current USD / SWTH pair. would not like to take a 50% IL risk on any type of (B)USD(C). Especially not when rewards are lower and risk % are higher to lose USD value.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • I
            itscryptojc @pwankey last edited by

            I am also in favour of keeping LP rewards at 30%, or maybe start at 30% and steadily decrease them to, say 15%. I think this will allow us to compete with other platforms particularly now that we have more pools to incentivise (besides, the high yield may serve as a good form of advertising).

            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • R
              ravenxce @padzank last edited by ravenxce

              @padzank We'll likely have a SWTH-BNB pair on PCS, so may not be useful. I agree with having a BNB pair somewhere though.

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • R
                ravenxce @itscryptojc last edited by

                @jcbisso Makes sense. We can try to go for a 30% -> 20% over 6 months if we want higher incentives.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • P
                  padzank @ravenxce last edited by

                  @ravenxce oh yeah, never thought about it that way. So i guess bnb/eth pair would make most sense as it promotes our crosschain capabilities and make us the best gateway for bsc/eth conversion

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • C
                    Cyptofan last edited by

                    I'm supporting 30% reward to attract LPs capital, and also 3x rewards for CEL pair, the too pair for legacy exchange before we lose this pair as well

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      Devel484 @ravenxce last edited by

                      @ravenxce said in [TIP-10] Extension of LP Rewards & Updating of Pool Weights:

                      In line with the sunsetting of the legacy Switcheo Exchange, we propose incentivizing the following pools (and listing the corresponding markets), so that we can have sufficiently liquid books to migrate existing users:

                      Would that mean CEL-ETH as well? Currently most important eth pair on switcheo exchange.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        Microtruffle @padzank last edited by Microtruffle

                        @padzank Yeah had wished for the same. If only for the idea that it can improved our relationship with Binance and their community by promoting this trough social media. Was hoping to attract more BNB investors to our DEX with just one BNB pair.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post