,,This proposal will first be put up as a forum post to invite open discussion with the community. If the majority of the community is agreeable, we will submit the Community Pool Spend proposal for voting on 23 Feb 2022.''
and what about this spend proposal? did we dismiss it? 2 days are now over
On this occasion, I will be voting yes to this proposal on behalf of "intsol community staking" stakers, but am also persuaded by posts above of the need to open-source and not create open-ended costs for the SDF.
I request the swth.info developers to reconsider their stance on open-sourcing the swth.info site and for other community developers (myself included) to provide alternative information sources for the community.
As well as the ZIL assets I think it would be good to have USDT/USDC and USDT/BUSD pairs listed. According to Devel's data presented in the last proposal the USDC/BUSD pair does ok without the LP incentives, so I don't think we would need them for these pairs either. USDT looks like it will be the default stablecoin of the ZIL ecosystem for now, and whatever you think of Tether's practices it is still very widely used on the ETH chain.