SDF should stay available for development purposes. Consider a proposal to divert a portion of the 10% tax to go to a new fund for initiatives such as this.

On this occasion, I will be voting yes to this proposal on behalf of "intsol community staking" stakers, but am also persuaded by posts above of the need to open-source and not create open-ended costs for the SDF. I request the swth.info developers to reconsider their stance on open-sourcing the swth.info site and for other community developers (myself included) to provide alternative information sources for the community.

Fantastic idea

This looks good! As well as the ZIL assets I think it would be good to have USDT/USDC and USDT/BUSD pairs listed. According to Devel's data presented in the last proposal the USDC/BUSD pair does ok without the LP incentives, so I don't think we would need them for these pairs either. USDT looks like it will be the default stablecoin of the ZIL ecosystem for now, and whatever you think of Tether's practices it is still very widely used on the ETH chain.

I am on board with this listing. Would we support both tokens? Soul has an ERC-20 and a NEP-5

Since now SWTH/USDC is 50-50 same as SWTH/BUSD 50-50: Should remove rewards from SWTH/BUSD and add that to SWTH/USDC - Total 24 Boost (Those coming from BUSD to buy SWTH have the USDC/BUSD pair). OR Make SWTH/USDC and SWTH/BUSD equal boost of 12 each. Having different weight for 50 SWTH - USDC 50 and 50 SWTH - BUSDC 50 makes no sense since both are 50-50 and essentially stable coin.

@newton I think it's a great idea for the team to colab with other worthy projects.

These are a good start. I'd also like to suggest adding bep-20 1inch/BUSD and erc-20 1INCH/USDC pairs next week if possible, since we've got 2 people willing to fund proposals and initial LP's.